Service Delivery Model
Benchmarking
Prior to undertaking any training, students complete a subject knowledge audit (SKA), where they rank their confidence level from one to five across the full range of the core knowledge requirements underpinning the teaching of the SKE subject. For each objective, trainees record a comment to qualify responses, providing further granular detail, useful for identifying areas of weakness that requires support. This process informs which units of study are selected for the SKE course, and this flexibility helps ensure that support and learning is focused to the subject and curriculum areas that require the most help.
Design and Delivery
- Biology
- Chemistry
- Computing
- Design and Technology
- English
- Languages
- Mathematics
- Physics
- Primary Maths
- Religious Education
More on delivery of SKE
- On-demand videos
- Reading lists
- PowerPoint lessons
- Exam style questions
- Native speaker tutorials for modern foreign languages (MFL)
Evaluation and Continuous Improvement
Participants are encouraged to engage and take responsibility for their learning, working collaboratively with Eureka tutors to ensure services continue to meet their needs
01
Gathering feedback
Students and tutors are proactively involved in the ongoing decision-making and development of the service. All views, whether prompted through our structured processes, complaints or ad hoc, are recorded, assessed and used to measure service satisfaction and identify areas of good practice or improvements.
02
Student feedback
Students are encouraged to complete a feedback form at the end of each session, ranking the lesson against key areas, including how beneficial the session was, responsiveness of the tutor, progress and overall satisfaction.
At the end of the SKE, students are also required to write a reflective essay regarding the course and their experience, enabling them to form and articulate holistic feedback to address their overall experience.
03
Tutor feedback
After each lesson, a report is produced by a Eureka tutor including:
- What was covered
- Participants’ level of engagement and progress
- Targets set for the next session (providing continuity if the tutor is unavailable).
The tutor is also asked to rank each student’s overall performance between 1 and 10, with low grades flagged on Eureka’s contract monitoring system to prompt further investigation by Kate Surtees (Eureka Director of Learning). Tutors also complete monthly feedback for each individual to address their progression, strengths and ‘next steps’ in their learning journey – positively encouraging continuous improvement.
04
Evaluating/responding to feedback
The SKE team hold internal weekly improvement meetings to discuss service delivery and its further enhancement. This is supplemented by sampling via the Grade Centre to assess the quality of feedback given by tutors to students’ work.
Our management team record and review all feedback from student surveys to identify individual service improvements such as broken links or dissatisfaction with a resource so the necessary improvements can be made.
We look forward to welcoming you onto our SKE course
We have what it takes to help you on your journey to becoming a qualified teacher